Status on that intel GFX chip? + r128

[Kyrre Ness Sjobak]

tir, 14.12.2004 kl. 11.36 skrev Hans de Goede:
> kyrre at solution-forge.net wrote:
> > Which driver (xorg.conf) and xorg verson is that?
> > 
> 
> Erm I'm not behind that machine right now, but its an FC2 install with 
> xorg upgraded from rawhide somewhere during FC3 testing. I'm using the 
> i810 driver afaik. The only problem I had was that the later xorg want 
> to load i915.o as drm module for the kernel and that wasn't shipped by 
> fedora at that time. I've filed a bug about this and later kernels have 
> it. I'm usign the latest kernel from FC2-updates.
> 
> BTW The reason for going to the rawhide xorg was that the FC2 xorg 
> crashes whenever a 3d screensaver kicks in, or maybe it was a powersave 
> problem, either way the current FC3 xorg should be fixed also.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Hans
> 
> 

So you can confirm that rawhide xorg + newest stable kernel (then fc3
should work as well) works? Any news from those people actually doing
the driver development/testing/packaging?

I have checked bugzilla, but nothing of interest.

Same basically goes to the rage 128 (?), which also seems broken. The
vesa driver works there, though.

> 
> > 
> >>Huh,
> >>
> >>I've a 865G at work and that works fine even the 3D is ok.
> >>
> >>Regards,
> >>
> >>Hans
> >>
> >>
> >>Kyrre Ness Sjobak wrote:
> >>
> >>>Hello
> >>>
> >>>I just wonder, and i know it has been brought up a zillion times - but
> >>>what are the current status of the intel gfx (i815?) xorg driver? Any
> >>>updates (rpms) that could be easily pushed into my net via admin-script?
> >>>
> >>>The vesa driver works - but it refuses to do anything more than a bare
> >>>minimum resolution, and the intel driver has some... funny... side
> >>>effects. Not anything i would like to expose my users to, really
> >>>
> >>>Kyrre
> >>>
> >>
> >>--
> >>fedora-devel-list mailing list
> >>fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
> >>http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
> >>
> > 
> >