svn or arch

Mike Hearn mike at navi.cx
Thu Dec 16 21:47:19 UTC 2004


On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 14:48:10 -0500, Neal D. Becker wrote:
> You might want to look at darcs.  This one looks the most promising, in it's
> design.  Only disadvantage, it's written in Haskell.

Darcs also has scalability issues as admitted to by the author. So I guess
it would fail for the same reasons subversion and arch did. 

thanks -mike




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list