svn or arch

[Neal Becker]

Mike Hearn wrote:

> On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 14:48:10 -0500, Neal D. Becker wrote:
>> You might want to look at darcs.  This one looks the most promising, in
>> it's
>> design.  Only disadvantage, it's written in Haskell.
> 
> Darcs also has scalability issues as admitted to by the author. So I guess
> it would fail for the same reasons subversion and arch did.
> 
> thanks -mike
> 

Yes, that's why I said the _design_ looks promising.  The implementation
still is immature.