svn or arch

[Colin Walters]

On Sat, 2004-12-18 at 00:40 +0100, Enrico Scholz wrote:
> walters at redhat.com (Colin Walters) writes:
> 
> > Yes; but you still have the rpm revision number.  I am arguing for its
> > removal entirely.
> 
> How will you workaround non-numeric versions which would break rpmvercmp()
> without manual revisions?

Perhaps the spec file could provide a little python function to fix
upstream versions.  Or you have an override file.  Or (preferably) you
get upstream to name their versions sanely.