[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: mplayer vs. xine
- From: Michael Schwendt <ms-nospam-0306 arcor de>
- To: fedora-devel-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: mplayer vs. xine
- Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2004 13:53:53 +0100
On Sat, 31 Jan 2004 17:00:17 -1000, Warren Togami wrote:
> Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> >
> > I think libdcvss is already in livna's xine set. Carrying
> > flash-plugin would be a good idea, though.
>
> Redistribution of flash-plugin is completely illegal under Macromedia's
> EULA, and also and unneeded since Macromedia has given me special
> permission to maintain RPM packages and apt/yum/urpmi repositories for
> the plugin.
>
> http://macromedia.mplug.org
It would be *much* better if the same packages could be included within a
repository like rpm.livna.org, so the user doesn't need to maintain an
increasing list of repositories for individual packages.
--
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]