[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: meta-repository idea (was Re: mplayer vs. xine)
- From: Hugo van der Kooij <hvdkooij vanderkooij org>
- To: fedora-devel-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: meta-repository idea (was Re: mplayer vs. xine)
- Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2004 14:39:44 +0100 (CET)
On Sun, 1 Feb 2004, Julien Olivier wrote:
> > It would be *much* better if the same packages could be included within a
> > repository like rpm.livna.org, so the user doesn't need to maintain an
> > increasing list of repositories for individual packages.
>
> Maybe something even better: isn't it possible for a repository to
> automatically include another repository. For example, it would be great
> if one repository could "depend" on more repositories (rpm.livna.org,
> macromedia.mplug.org, jpackage.org etc...) so that end-users would only
> have to add 1 line in there yum.conf and still get packages from many
> repositories. It would be a kind of meta-repository.
Preferably with a an option to do this on a package by package basis.
Hugo.
--
All email sent to me is bound to the rules described on my homepage.
hvdkooij vanderkooij org http://hvdkooij.xs4all.nl/
Don't meddle in the affairs of sysadmins,
for they are subtle and quick to anger.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]