[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Version Control System Comparison (was Re: not SVN?)
- From: "Mike A. Harris" <mharris redhat com>
- To: fedora-devel-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: Version Control System Comparison (was Re: not SVN?)
- Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 00:12:59 -0500 (EST)
On Mon, 2 Feb 2004, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
>> There is going to be plenty of time to play with alternative solutions
>> once we have in place at least one. Every solution has its supporters and
>> opposition, and we're not going to get unanimity no matter what.
>>
>> I happen to know CVS and I think that most people are familiar with CVS.
>> It is not perfect, it has its faults, but its faults are widely known. I
>> can take few days to put out the CVS server or I can take few weeks to
>> review other solutions that I'm not that familiar with. I'd rather have
>> the CVS out.
>
>Better SCM Initiative [1] has a very nice "Version Control System Comparison":
>http://better-scm.berlios.de/comparison/
GNU cssc is the best SCM solution hands down. We should switch
to cssc sometime in the future and leave CVS in the dust.
--
Mike A. Harris ftp://people.redhat.com/mharris
OS Systems Engineer - XFree86 maintainer - Red Hat
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]