[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: not SVN? (was: An introduction of the new cheerleader...)



On Tue, 2004-01-27 at 18:10 +0100, Pau Aliagas wrote:
[snip]

> I'd definately go for arch. It supports signed archives, repository
> integrity checks, distributed development, easy branching, no special
> server needed (ftp, sftp, http and webdav would do).
> 
https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1266

A guinea pig for my package!

Thanks,

- Michel

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]