Closing bugs UPSTREAM
Michel Alexandre Salim
salimma at fastmail.fm
Sun Feb 22 07:54:35 UTC 2004
On Sat, 2004-02-21 at 20:18 +0100, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Hello Mark,
>
> > We want to work upstream as much as possible.
>
> With this I firmly agree. But that does not mean that bugs that are
> fixed locally (ie by applying upstream patches or update releases)
> should be closed as UPSTREAM, because in relation to the distribution
> they are fixed CURRENTRELEASE.
>
[snip]
But would not CURRENTRELEASE indicate that an update has been released
by the distributor (Red Hat/Fedora) ? It's similar to RAWHIDE which
indicate that the bug has been closed in the development tree.
- Michel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20040222/8bf5b0db/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list