Closing bugs UPSTREAM
Mark McLoughlin
markmc at redhat.com
Sun Feb 22 19:05:53 UTC 2004
Hi,
On Sun, 2004-02-22 at 14:07, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Hi Marc,
Its Mark.
> > I'm trying to figure out what you think doing it this way would achieve
> > ... I may be missing something here, you know :-)
>
> Closing bugs as UPSTREAM is ambiguous if you close both bugs that are
> fixed and not yet fixed upstream.
I don't understand. Why is it ambiguous? Why does it matter?
Thanks,
Mark.
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list