Athlon Incompatible Packages

[Tom Diehl]

On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Mike A. Harris wrote:

> On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Tom Diehl wrote:
> 
> >Why would you think it was a bug? AFAIK, it is done on purpose. As you quoted
> >above there are no signifigant performance gains to be realized by doing that
> >and it would be a lot of work to do that and maintain it. IOW the cure is worse
> >than the disease.
> 
> I don't think anyone should oppose volunteer contributions of 
> patches to fix things.

Just for the record I am not opposed in any way to "volunteer contributions of
patches to fix things." When this thread first started it appeared to me that
he thought there should be athlon along with i386, i686, etc. packages. I now
see I was wrong about where this was headed.

Sorry,

Tom