include much needed antivirus products in FC2

Michael Schwendt ms-nospam-0306 at arcor.de
Tue Jan 6 23:02:28 UTC 2004


On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 11:14:34 -0600, Steven Pritchard wrote:

> Actually, in my really, really, really light testing of the clamav
> package, I wasn't impressed either.  I still prefer my package.

With regard to what?

> But I never had time to QA the clamav package, so I'm not sure I have
> the right to complain.

Voice your concerns as loudly as you like. But please provide some
details, not just superficial criticism like above.

> Note to Warren: You might want to move that clamav package back out
> into testing.

What would that change?

> The basic problem here is that some packages just don't have much of a
> user base.  (Until amavis or something is included in fedora.us, there
> probably won't be that many users of clamav.)  It's still hard to find
> enough users who know the software and care enough to get packages
> through fedora.us's QA, but I have to assume that will get better.

Raises the question what you would make different?

-- 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20040107/4ca0c482/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list