Re: pine RPM and IPv6 for imapd

[Antonio Querubin <tony lava net>]

On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, Jef Spaleta wrote:

> doubt you do either. But you know...i bet this license has come up for
> OSI consideration in the past, and there is probably discussion archived
> on the OSI relevant mailinglists that you can research if you care
> enough to want to understand.

Found a whole thread on this and now my head hurts.  I guess the bottom
line is figuring out what's really acceptable for Fedora inclusion.  I'm
beginning to like the FreeBSD ports system better.