[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: "Official" Companion (was Fedora Core 2 Distribution Size -Theseparated OS)
- From: Jef Spaleta <jspaleta princeton edu>
- To: fedora-devel-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: "Official" Companion (was Fedora Core 2 Distribution Size -Theseparated OS)
- Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 15:21:41 -0500
Karsten Wade wrote:
> I had to do some fact checking to be sure this is (mostly) correct.
> Caveat lector: I am writing this as a Fedora docs project member and
> _not_ as a representative of Red Hat, Inc. I.e., I'm a writer, not a
> lawyer. :)
Thank you for the response, that pretty much finishes clearing up
whatever eyebrow raising issues I have with the situation. And the IANAL
advice for avoiding the word 'Official' by anything actually
blessed/produced via the Fedora project in general, seems like a clear
moral imperative to me to shun the use of that word.
I guess my questions about where fedoranews.org fits into the global
view of the community documentation effort is best suited for the
docs-list.
-jef"i wonder if Colin will quote you in the next edition of the news
summary"spaleta
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]