Re: QA process was Re: RPM submission procedure

[Enrico Scholz <enrico scholz informatik tu-chemnitz de>]

toshio tiki-lounge com (Toshio) writes:

> Concerns about the autobuilder downloading a different src.rpm/tarball
> than the QA testers can be alleviated (entirely?) by having QA testers
> submit hashes of the files they're testing.

Already requested by fedora.us procedures:

http://www.fedora.us/wiki/PackageSubmissionQAPolicy

| In cases where a QA message would lead to package approval or publication,
| the message MUST be GPG clearsigned, and contain md5sums of the reviewed
| source RPM as well as preferably all upstream sources.


> Then the autobuilder has to check that the files it's working with
> match the ones the QA testers tested.

fedora.us buildsystem is doing this exactly.



Enrico