repository- & disttag order (was: Fedora Extras)
Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano
nando at ccrma.Stanford.EDU
Fri Jan 9 01:47:30 UTC 2004
On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 08:17, Enrico Scholz wrote:
> warren at togami.com (Warren Togami) writes:
> > ** Fully numeric disstags have been favored by RH and fedora.us leadership
> > in past discussions, but this requires more discussion.
> > ...
> > ** reptag will be necessary for all other repositories. The current
> > proposal is attaching it at the end of %{release}.
>
> reptag at the end causes ambiguities. You can not say if '1.1.1.foo'
> means versions 1.1 for FC1, or if it means version 1 for FC1.1.
>
> repotag before disttag is the only way which makes sense; see
>
> http://www.fedora.us/pipermail/fedora-devel/2003-December/002478.html
You're right. Sounds good. And additionally it makes numeric
distribution tags readable (not just a number amongst other numbers but
separated from the rest by the repository tag - the "and which of these
numbers is the disttag?" question was one of my dislikes of the purely
numeric scheme).
-- Fernando
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list