replacing MTRG with cricket.

[Charles R. Anderson]

On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 02:38:44PM -0700, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> I like cricket myself... but I think this may need a good package in
> fedora.us (if it isnt there already) and some testing to make sure it
> has all the needed stuff.
> 
> On Fri, 2004-01-16 at 14:18, shane at geeklords.org wrote:
> > Has there been any discussion toward either replacing MRTG with cricket, 
> > or adding cricket to fedora?  The only advantages I can think of that MRTG 
> > holds over cricket is that MRTG depends on less supporting software (i.e. 
> > RRD, perl libs etc..).  In every other way I have measured cricket is more 
> > advanced / functional / easy to use.

I use both Cricket (for internal use) and MRTG (for public
consumption), because I haven't found a decent user-friendly front-end
to Cricket.  I also like the fact that MRTG doesn't require a CGI to
run for every client that views the graphs, although I'm not
completely opposed to using one if needed for Cricket.