Re: replacing MTRG with cricket.

[Terje Bless <link pobox com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hugo van der Kooij <hvdkooij vanderkooij org> wrote:

>On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Terje Bless wrote:
>
>>[…] rrdtool is a common prerequisite for both MRTG and Cricket; […]
>
>MRTG does NOT require rrdtool. It can use it but does not require it at
>all.

Right, for MRTG 2 it is merely strongly recommended (since it improves
performance by 80% vs. «rateup»); for MRTG 3 it will be The One True Way.

In either case, having RRDtool as a package would be usefull whichever
monitoring tool is chosen. Depending on IRL constraints, I may be interested
in working on this (if I ever get around to figuring out the proper process).

- -- 
> I suggest you attend some sort of anger management class....
That's where you learn to upset the PHBs? -- Peter da Silva

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP SDK 3.0.3

iQA/AwUBQA5A6aPyPrIkdfXsEQKTdwCg0e8fJq6uKZSWWObUy1nSLGBs4DEAoLqO
jM+9aCmTgkk9hg4xgU2SAfwf
=zIL8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----