Re: sylpheed (and inclusions)

[Bill Nottingham <notting redhat com>]

seth vidal (skvidal phy duke edu) said: 
> > if akira is not taking care of the package, and if we include sylpheed
> > in FC2, I'd like to take it. Seems like a harmless enough exercise,
> > it cannot be worse than having a dead maintainer, right?
> 
> how is the set of packages that is to be included in fc2 to be
> determined?
> 
> is there a raffle? Can I put 2 bits down on something? :)
> seriously - how do we tell?

sylpheed is on the list because it was there before.

Bill