Re: sylpheed (and inclusions)

[Michael Schwendt <ms-nospam-0306 arcor de>]

On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 16:52:40 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:

> > > if akira is not taking care of the package, and if we include sylpheed
> > > in FC2, I'd like to take it. Seems like a harmless enough exercise,
> > > it cannot be worse than having a dead maintainer, right?
> > 
> > how is the set of packages that is to be included in fc2 to be
> > determined?
> > 
> > is there a raffle? Can I put 2 bits down on something? :)
> > seriously - how do we tell?
> 
> sylpheed is on the list because it was there before.

Though, unfortunately, it's built without GPG support due to lack of GPGME
packages in Fedora Core.

My attempt at providing a GPG-enabled Sylpheed at fedora.us has failed
long ago due to lack of interest.

--