Re: cpuspeed proposal

[Matthew Miller <mattdm mattdm org>]

On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 11:45:28PM +0000, Rui Miguel Seabra wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-01-27 at 21:44, Warren Togami wrote:
> > 4) Either way display [OK] rather than [FAILED] to not alarm the users 
> > where cpufreq is not available.
> Warren,
> What about [PASSED] in yellow?
> It's just that OK is a little misleading too.

[PASSED] seems a little weird for "not available with this hardware"....


-- 
Matthew Miller           mattdm mattdm org        <http://www.mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux      ------>                <http://linux.bu.edu/>