MySQL and PHP now OK together?

[nathan r. hruby]

On Thu, 29 Jan 2004, =?ISO-8859-1?Q? Nils O. Sel=E5sdal?= wrote:

> On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 16:27, nathan r. hruby wrote:
> > On Thu, 29 Jan 2004, =?ISO-8859-1?Q? Nils O. Sel=E5sdal?= wrote:
> > 
> > > On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 15:19, nathan r. hruby wrote:
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112433
> > > > 
> > > > There are also a few bugs in MySQL's bugzilla.  It works, but give it 
> > > > some load and it be slow.  If you're not seeing this, please let me 
> > > > know how you built it and your config! :)
> > > Did you look into the issue about mysqld possibly beeing statically
> > > linked ?
> > > 
> > 
> > Yeah it is, so I rebuilt it on AS3 and it didn't get any better.  So I 
> > tried mysql-max which isn't static and that wasn't a whole lot better 
> > either.  I'm hoping to have tomorrow afternoon to rebuild it again with
> > all static options removed in vanilla MySQL and see how that goes, as 
> > well as using  LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5 instead of 2.4.1.  
> > 
> No, I meant if *your* rebuild of Mysql produces a statically linked
> mysqld. If so try to get rid of it. afaik  LD_ASSUME_KERNEL won't have
> much effect on statically linked applications.

Right, mine did, but mysql-max which is also built isn't (AFIK).  I'll be 
rebuilding again tomorrow the non max version dynamically to see what the
deal is.

-n

-- 
-------------------------------------------
nathan hruby <nhruby at uga.edu>
uga enterprise information technology services
production systems support
metaphysically wrinkle-free
-------------------------------------------