[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: mplayer vs. xine
- From: seth vidal <skvidal phy duke edu>
- To: fedora-devel-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: mplayer vs. xine
- Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 03:12:35 -0500
On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 03:09, Geoff Teale wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 07:42, seth vidal wrote:
> > totem with the xine backend makes for a nice front end to xine. I've
> > been using it for all my movie watching and it's a nice, simple and
> > obvious (for the most part) interface.
> >
> > it's in the livna archives if anyone wants to try it out.
> > -sv
>
> Totem is great. One way it scores over straight Xine is that it
> maintains the Gtk2 look of the default Gnome desktop which, whilst not
> as pretty as a Xine or Mplayer skin, looks a whole lot more
It's funny, I've never liked the default xine or mplayer skins b/c I can
never figure out what the damn buttons do.
Totem's buttons are obvious or labeled.
So from an ease-of-use standpoint sometimes consistent is much nicer
than pretty.
-sv
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]