[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: mplayer vs. xine
- From: Julien Olivier <julo altern org>
- To: fedora-devel-list redhat com
- Cc: Dams <anvilatlivna org thyrsus com>
- Subject: Re: mplayer vs. xine
- Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 15:05:30 +0000
> Michael (and the rpm.livna.org maintainer), please see my brand-new HOWTO
> on this topic:
>
> http://tldp.org/HOWTO/Fedora-Multimedia-Installation-HOWTO/index.html
>
> I found I had to add freshrpms in order to get apt. I needed apt in order
> to get jre RPMs from Dag Wieers's repository.
>
> I would actually like to recommend livna only in my HOWTO, but there
> are things it lacks. If livna wants to be the one-stop shop for
> everything proprietary and patented that isn't in Fedora Core (which
> is where it seems to be heading, and I heartily approve), then it
> needs to carry the following:
>
> Java jre RPMs (see Dag Wieers's repostory)
> mame and mame ROM RPMs
XMame is totally free and legal, isn't it ? Mame ROMS are illegal
though, and not only in the US (this is not a software patent problem).
> RealPlayer RPMs (see http://cambuca.ldhs.cetuc.puc-rio.br/xine/)
> Win32 binary-codec RPMs to be used with mplayer
How about Flash plugin and libdvdcss ?
--
Julien Olivier <julo altern org>
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]