[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: mplayer vs. xine
- From: Michael Schwendt <ms-nospam-0306 arcor de>
- To: fedora-devel-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: mplayer vs. xine
- Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 17:58:54 +0100
On Sat, 31 Jan 2004 11:28:20 -0500, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
[rpm.livna.org]
> > > I would actually like to recommend livna only in my HOWTO, but there
> > > are things it lacks. If livna wants to be the one-stop shop for
> > > everything proprietary and patented that isn't in Fedora Core (which
> > > is where it seems to be heading, and I heartily approve), then it
> > > needs to carry the following:
> > >
> > > Java jre RPMs (see Dag Wieers's repostory)
> > > mame and mame ROM RPMs
> > > RealPlayer RPMs (see http://cambuca.ldhs.cetuc.puc-rio.br/xine/)
> > > Win32 binary-codec RPMs to be used with mplayer
> >
> > Yes. It's a problem of lack of human resources.
>
> Can I help? If it's just a problem of rounding up RPMs and dropping them
> in the repository, I can do that.
... unless the manual package submission and building procedure puts you
off. ;-) Whether there're ways for you to contribute packages via other
ways than the "fedora.us-like bugzilla package request procedure" at
bugzilla.livna.org, you'd better talk to <anvil at livna.org>
Basically, the repository is an open community project like fedora.us,
using the same guidelines and policies, probably adjusted slightly for
productivity and a "just-works" philosophy.
--
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]