Re: Submission process (was: Re: Self-Introduction: Michael Tiemann)

["Nils O." Selåsdal <NOS Utel no>]

On Wed, 2004-06-30 at 18:00, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 14:58:56 +0200, Rudi Chiarito wrote:

> At fedora.us, further QA policy changes are in the queue. One which allows
> for new packages to enter the "unstable" repository after a very basic
> review (in particular the security relevant checks) and then hope that the
> community reports any missing flaws. But even then, the packagers ought to
> make sure their packages build at least on all the target platforms and
> adhere to the packaging guidelines, too. The packagers themselves should
> do a good portion of the QA for their packages. For instance, there is
> documentation on how to use 'fedora-rmdevelrpms' or 'mach' to find missing
> build dependencies. And there are several other packaging topics covered
> in the Wiki, too.
Which btw reminds me, is where can I get a mach configurations for FC2 ?