Major number in library package names

[Toshio]

I ran rpmlint on the qof library package I just made and had it tell me:

qof-0.5.0:
  E: qof incoherent-version-in-name 0.5.0
  The package name should contain the major version of the library.

qof-devel-0.5.0:
  W: qof-devel no-major-in-name qof-devel
  The major number of the library isn't contained in the package name.

What do people think?  Is it good practice to include the major number
in the name of the package (qof0-0.5.0 similar to gtkhtml3 and db4) or
is this just rpmlint being overzealous?

-Toshio
-- 
_______S________U________B________L________I________M________E_______
  t  o  s  h  i  o  +  t  i  k  i  -  l  o  u  n  g  e  .  c  o  m
                                                          GA->ME 1999
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20040715/a98f5124/attachment.sig>