[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Fedora Core 3
- From: Russell Coker <russell coker com au>
- To: fedora-devel-list redhat com
- Cc: Paul Jakma <paul dishone st>
- Subject: Re: Fedora Core 3
- Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 14:29:36 +1000
On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 10:17, Paul Jakma <paul dishone st> wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Jul 2004, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> > Is it specified somewhere or is it you opinion?
>
> My opinion, given that there is a huge body of existing RPMs out
> there for i386 and they're unlikely to be going away, and i'd like to
> be able to install them without fear of overwriting x86_64 binaries.
Why would you want to have both i386 and AMD64 binaries installed at the same
time?
Surely if you have a 64bit version of a program then the correct thing to do
is just not install the 32bit version!
--
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]