[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Definition of Open Source [was Re: pine: UW permission to distribute]
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva redhat com>
- To: Warren Togami <wtogami redhat com>
- Cc: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Definition of Open Source [was Re: pine: UW permission to distribute]
- Date: 22 Jul 2004 15:23:28 -0300
On Jul 21, 2004, Warren Togami <wtogami redhat com> wrote:
> I do agree that Fedora Core should always be 100% Open Source. I also
> believe that Extras need not be this strict. If you dislike some part
> of Extras, then just don't use it.
Unless some other package you do want to use happens to have been
built in such a way that it depends on a package you'd rather not
use, such that the one you didn't want may get installed onto your box
and you may not even notice.
--
Alexandre Oliva http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva {redhat com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist oliva {lsd ic unicamp br, gnu.org}
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]