2004-June Archive by Date
01 June 2004
02 June 2004
- Re: fc2, xorg, 2.6.x, scheduling latency peaks Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano
- Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM) Bryan J. Smith
- P2 CPU "class," but 386/486 ISA "core" are commonplace -- WAS: i586/686 glibc/kernel Bryan J. Smith
- Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- i386 is still around Matthew Miller
- Re: P2 CPU "class, " but 386/486 ISA "core" are commonplace -- WAS: i586/686 glibc/kernel Per Bjornsson
- Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- i386 is still around Per Bjornsson
- Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- i386 is still around Matthew Miller
- Rebuilding Arjan's kernel-*.src.rpm Chris Kloiber
- Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- not "older systems," "older ISAs" Bryan J. Smith
- Re: P2 CPU "class, " but 386/486 ISA "core" are commonplace -- AMD5x86 = 486 ISA Bryan J. Smith
- Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- not "older systems, " "older ISAs" Matthew Miller
- Re: Rebuilding Arjan's kernel-*.src.rpm Chris Chabot
- Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- more "mainstream" or "popular"? Bryan J. Smith
- eMachines M680x kernel (Was: Rebuilding Arjan's kernel-*.src.rpm) Chris Kloiber
- Re: Join GPG web of trust? Panu Matilainen
- Re: Rebuilding Arjan's kernel-*.src.rpm Arjan van de Ven
- Re: fc2, xorg, 2.6.x, scheduling latency peaks Arjan van de Ven
- Re: fc2, xorg, 2.6.x, scheduling latency peaks Arjan van de Ven
- Re: udev in initrd Harald Hoyer
- Re: udev in initrd Harald Hoyer
- Re: udev in initrd Thomas Woerner
- Re: Join GPG web of trust? Michael Schwendt
- Re: systematic Kerberization Pau Aliagas
- [OT-Slashdot] McAfee Granted Far-Reaching Spam-Control Patent Chris Kloiber
- rawhide report: 20040602 changes Build System
- Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- i386 is still around Leonard den Ottolander
- Re: eMachines M680x kernel (Was: Rebuilding Arjan's kernel-*.src.rpm) Stephen Smoogen
- Re: [OT-Slashdot] McAfee Granted Far-Reaching Spam-Control Patent Stephen Smoogen
- Re: [OT-Slashdot] McAfee Granted Far-Reaching Spam-Control Patent Matthew Miller
- Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- i386 is still around Matthew Miller
- Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- more "mainstream" or "popular"? Matthew Miller
- Dependencies problems with gimp and abiword Casimiro de Almeida Barreto
- Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- not "lite," "Core" capable systems Bryan J. Smith
- Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM) Alan Cox
- Re: P2 CPU "class, " but 386/486 ISA "core" are commonplace -- WAS: i586/686 glibc/kernel Alan Cox
- Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- i386 is still around Alan Cox
- Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- i386 is still around P
- Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- not "older systems, " "older ISAs" Alan Cox
- Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- i386 is still around Alan Cox
- Re: fc2, xorg, 2.6.x, scheduling latency peaks Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano
- Re: Join GPG web of trust? Chris McDonough
- Re: fc2, xorg, 2.6.x, scheduling latency peaks Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano
- Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- 486 ISA, WinChip Bryan J. Smith
- Re: fc2, xorg, 2.6.x, scheduling latency peaks Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano
- Re: fc2, xorg, 2.6.x, scheduling latency peaks Arjan van de Ven
- Re: fc2, xorg, 2.6.x, scheduling latency peaks Alan Cox
- Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- 486 ISA, WinChip Alan Cox
- Re: fc2, xorg, 2.6.x, scheduling latency peaks Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano
- Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- i386 is still around Matthew Miller
- Re: Spamassassin [Fwd: 3.0.0 schedule] Dax Kelson
- Re: udev in initrd Jeremy Katz
- Re: udev in initrd Jeremy Katz
- Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- 486 ISA, WinChip Leonard den Ottolander
- Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- i386 is still around Leonard den Ottolander
- Re: Spamassassin [Fwd: 3.0.0 schedule] Chris Chabot
- Re: Spamassassin [Fwd: 3.0.0 schedule] Dax Kelson
- Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- 486 ISA, WinChip Dave Jones
- Re: fc2, xorg, 2.6.x, scheduling latency peaks Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano
03 June 2004
- Re: fc2, xorg, 2.6.x, scheduling latency peaks Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano
- Re: [Jackit-devel] Re: fc2, xorg, 2.6.x, scheduling latency peaks Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano
- Re: systematic Kerberization Doncho N. Gunchev
- Re: systematic Kerberization Pau Aliagas
- Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora. Phil Knirsch
- Re: Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora. Chris Chabot
- Re: Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora. Florian La Roche
- Re: Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora. Alan Cox
- Re: Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora. Chris Chabot
- Re: Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora. Alan Cox
- Re: Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora. Florian La Roche
- Re: Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora. Matthew T. O'Connor
- Re: Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora. -- "standards" Bryan J. Smith
- Re: Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora. Chris Adams
- Re: Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora. -- "standards" Alan Cox
- Re: Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora. Nicolas Mailhot
- Re: [OT-Slashdot] McAfee Granted Far-Reaching Spam-Control Patent Rik van Riel
- kernel-module rpms under FC2 Aaron Bennett
- Linux: x86 No Execute Support Neal D. Becker
- Re: Linux: x86 No Execute Support Alan Cox
- RPM filesystem? Tim Daly
- Re: Linux: x86 No Execute Support Arjan van de Ven
- Re: Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora. Bill Nottingham
- Re: Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora. Alan Cox
- Re: RPM filesystem? Jos Vos
- Re: Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora. Florian La Roche
- rawhide report: 20040603 changes Build System
- Re: Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora. Bill Nottingham
- Re: 3ware 9500 Peter Maas
- Re: kernel-module rpms under FC2 Dave Jones
- Dear Fedora Community, what do you want? Scott Sloan
- RE: RPM filesystem? Erik LaBianca
- Re: Dear Fedora Community, what do you want? Rui Miguel Seabra
- Re: Dear Fedora Community, what do you want? Tim Waugh
- Re: Dear Fedora Community, what do you want? Nicolas Mailhot
- Re: Dear Fedora Community, what do you want? Alan Cox
- Re: RPM filesystem? Nicolas Mailhot
- Fedora Core 2 upgrade FAILURE Richard Emberson
- Re: Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora. -- sed -e g/lsb/fhs/i Bryan J. Smith
- Re: Fedora Core 2 upgrade FAILURE Luciano Miguel Ferreira Rocha
- Re: Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora. Remco Treffkorn
- Re: Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora. Nicolas Mailhot
- The USB keys bug Jean Francois Martinez
- Re: The USB keys bug Konstantin Ryabitsev
- Re: The USB keys bug Jeff Spaleta
- Re: The USB keys bug John (J5) Palmieri
- Re: The USB keys bug Konstantin Ryabitsev
- Re: Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora. Matthew Miller
- Re: RPM filesystem? Doncho N. Gunchev
- Re: Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora. Noa Resare
- Re: Dear Fedora Community, what do you want? dhollis
- RE: QA Application XML save formats. Erik LaBianca
- Re: Fedora Core 2 upgrade FAILURE dhollis
- Rawhide upgrades Warren Togami
- What happened to gtkmm2 ? Denis Leroy
04 June 2004
05 June 2004
06 June 2004
- Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM) William M. Quarles
- Grub + DualBoot + ChainLoader Morteza A. Nia
- Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM) Per Bjornsson
- rawhide report: 20040606 changes Build System
- Re: Grub + DualBoot + ChainLoader Chris Chabot
- Re: Inflation of explicit build requirements Leonard den Ottolander
- Re: kernel module packages Alan Cox
- Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM) Alan Cox
- Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM) Alan Cox
- Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel?-- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM) Chris Chabot
- Re: Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel?-- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM) Crutcher Dunnavant
- Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel?-- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM) Razvan Corneliu C.R. \"d3vi1\" VILT
- Re: Re: Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel?-- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM) Jeff Spaleta
- Re: small improvements for fedora 3: sound mixing William M. Quarles
- Re: Re: Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel?-- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM) Luciano Miguel Ferreira Rocha
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel?-- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM) Jeff Spaleta
- USB CD/DVD Burner eric tanguy
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel?-- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM) Luciano Miguel Ferreira Rocha
- Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel?-- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM) Alan Cox
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel?-- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM) Crutcher Dunnavant
- Re: USB CD/DVD Burner Casimiro de Almeida Barreto
- Re: USB CD/DVD Burner eric tanguy
- Re: USB CD/DVD Burner Arjan van de Ven
- Shrinking/splitting up core Was: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc... Tom Diehl
- Re: Intel® 536ep V.92 modem (PCI) chipset driver & 2.6 kernel under FC2 Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel?-- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM) Phillip Compton
- Re: Shrinking/splitting up core Was: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc... Willem Riede
- Re: Re: Shrinking/splitting up core Was: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc... Crutcher Dunnavant
- Re: Re: Shrinking/splitting up core Was: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc... Willem Riede
- BogoMips strange behaviour StoneBeat
- irda problems [FC2] k b
07 June 2004
- Re: Re: Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel?-- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM) Leonard den Ottolander
- Re: Inflation of explicit build requirements Alexandre Oliva
- Re: fc2, xorg, 2.6.x, scheduling latency peaks Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano
- Error rebuilding Arjan's 422 kenrel Chris Kloiber
- Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Versions of glibc and kernel?-- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM) mlauterbach
- Re: Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Versions of glibc and kernel?-- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM) Crutcher Dunnavant
- Re: Shrinking/splitting up core Was: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc... Steven Pritchard
- Re: Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Versions of glibc andkernel?-- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM) Chris Chabot
- Re: Inflation of explicit build requirements Ralf Corsepius
- Re: Inflation of explicit build requirements Remco Treffkorn
- Re: Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Versions of glibc andkernel?-- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM) Leonard den Ottolander
- Re: Inflation of explicit build requirements Leonard den Ottolander
- Re: BogoMips strange behaviour Dave Jones
- Re: Inflation of explicit build requirements Ralf Corsepius
- Re: Error rebuilding Arjan's 422 kenrel Arjan van de Ven
- Re: Error rebuilding Arjan's 422 kenrel Chris Kloiber
- Re: Inflation of explicit build requirements Michael Schwendt
- Re: Inflation of explicit build requirements Ralf Corsepius
- Re: Error rebuilding Arjan's 422 kenrel djh
- Re: Shrinking/splitting up core Was: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc... Stephen Smoogen
- Re: kernel-module rpms under FC2 Aaron Bennett
- Re: Re: Shrinking/splitting up core Was: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc... Jeff Spaleta
- Fedora Documentation Alan Cox
- Re: Adaptec Ultra320 SCSI RAID-1 driver Jeremy Katz
- Re: Fedora Documentation Gérard Milmeister
- Re: Fedora Documentation Tim Daly
- Re: Fedora Documentation Alan Cox
- Re: Shrinking/splitting up core Was: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc... Steven Pritchard
- Re: Shrinking/splitting up core Was: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc... kbn
- Re: Error rebuilding Arjan's 422 kenrel Tom Diehl
- Re: Re: Re: Shrinking/splitting up core Was: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc... Crutcher Dunnavant
- Re: Error rebuilding Arjan's 422 kenrel Chris Kloiber
- Re: Shrinking/splitting up core Was: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc... David Kewley
- Re: Shrinking/splitting up core Was: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc... Tom Diehl
- SUMMARY: 3 similar, but distinct, discussions on "Core" changes ... Bryan J. Smith
- Re: Error rebuilding Arjan's 422 kenrel David Kewley
- S3 sleep with kernel 422 and ATI Radeon problem Philip Balister
- Re: Fedora Documentation alan
- rawhide report: 20040607 changes Build System
- Re: Fedora Core 2 upgrade FAILURE Richard Emberson
- RE: Fedora Core 2 upgrade FAILURE Otto Haliburton
- Re: Error rebuilding Arjan's 422 kenrel Tom Diehl
- Re: Shrinking/splitting up core Was: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc... Willem Riede
- Re: P2 CPU "class, " but 386/486 ISA "core" are commonplace -- embedded developers use what they know ... Bryan J. Smith
08 June 2004
09 June 2004
10 June 2004
- Re: Xsecurity [was Re: OpenSSH Re: rawhide report: 20040608 changes] Havoc Pennington
- Re: Gnome Icons, Gnome/KDE Menus need improvement Havoc Pennington
- Re: Gnome Icons, Gnome/KDE Menus need improvement Ivan Gyurdiev
- CPAN spec file generator needs testing, feedback Steven Pritchard
- Re: CPAN spec file generator needs testing, feedback Warren Togami
- Re: Multiple LUN support? Warren Togami
- Self-Introduction: Alan Olsen Alan
- Re: CPAN spec file generator needs testing, feedback Alan
- Re: X not starting with intel 845 graphics Alan
- Re: CPAN spec file generator needs testing, feedback Warren Togami
- Re: CPAN spec file generator needs testing, feedback Alan
- xorg and IBM Thinkpad T30 Hetz Ben Hamo
- Re: xorg and IBM Thinkpad T30 Warren Togami
- syslog snafu Richard Hally
- Re: syslog snafu Nicolas Mailhot
- Re: syslog snafu Richard Hally
- Re: Multiple LUN support? Rui Miguel Seabra
- Re: Xsecurity [was Re: OpenSSH Re: rawhide report: 20040608 changes] Alan Cox
- Re: CPAN spec file generator needs testing, feedback Chip Turner
- Re: Gnome Icons, Gnome/KDE Menus need improvement Dan Williams
- OpenSSH - configuring x11 forwarding (was Re: rawhide report: 20040608 changes) John Ellson
- Re: Gnome Icons, Gnome/KDE Menus need improvement Jeff Spaleta
- Re: Gnome Icons, Gnome/KDE Menus need improvement Ivan Gyurdiev
- Re: CPAN spec file generator needs testing, feedback Steven Pritchard
- Re: CPAN spec file generator needs testing, feedback Steven Pritchard
- Re: CPAN spec file generator needs testing, feedback Steven Pritchard
- proposal: best practices for cron jobs in RPM packages Florin Andrei
- Re: CPAN spec file generator needs testing, feedback Warren Togami
- Re: proposal: best practices for cron jobs in RPM packages Tom Diehl
- Re: Static routes. a default static-routes file. Florin Andrei
- Re: proposal: best practices for cron jobs in RPM packages Miloslav Trmac
11 June 2004
12 June 2004
13 June 2004
14 June 2004
15 June 2004
16 June 2004
17 June 2004
18 June 2004
19 June 2004
20 June 2004
21 June 2004
22 June 2004
23 June 2004
24 June 2004
25 June 2004
- GFS over a wan? was: Status of GFS licensing/availability? Mike Fedyk
- Re: No more kernel-source(code) ??? (was: rawhide report: 20040623 changes) Stan Bubrouski
- Re: No more kernel-source(code) ??? (was: rawhide report: 20040623 changes) Alexandre Oliva
- Re: No more kernel-source(code) ??? (was: rawhide report: 20040623 changes) Alexandre Oliva
- Re: No more kernel-source(code) ??? (was: rawhide report: 20040623 changes) Thorsten Leemhuis
- Re: No more kernel-source(code) ??? (was: rawhide report: 20040623 changes) Alexandre Oliva
- Unnanounced migration phase at its end, non-transparency, "open" community project ... (was: No more kernel-source(code) ???) Axel Thimm
- Re: No more kernel-source(code) ??? (was: rawhide report: 20040623 changes) Matias Feliciano
- Re: No more kernel-source(code) ??? (was: rawhide report: 20040623 changes) Thorsten Leemhuis
- Re: No more kernel-source(code) ??? (was: rawhide report: 20040623 changes) Arjan van de Ven
- Re: No more kernel-source(code) ??? (was: rawhide report: 20040623 changes) Alan Cox
- Re: external modules issues Matthias Saou
- rawhide report: 20040625 changes Build System
- Re: No more kernel-source(code) ??? (was: rawhide report: 20040623 changes) Leonard den Ottolander
- Re: No more kernel-source(code) ??? (was: rawhide report: 20040623 changes) Leonard den Ottolander
- Re: No more kernel-source(code) ??? (was: rawhide report: 20040623 changes) Arjan van de Ven
- Re: No more kernel-source(code) ??? (was: rawhide report: 20040623 changes) Leonard den Ottolander
- Re: No more kernel-source(code) ??? (was: rawhide report: 20040623 changes) Arjan van de Ven
- Re: No more kernel-source(code) ??? (was: rawhide report: 20040623 changes) Leonard den Ottolander
- Re: No more kernel-source(code) ??? (was: rawhide report: 20040623 changes) Matias Feliciano
- Re: No more kernel-source(code) ??? (was: rawhide report: 20040623 changes) Arjan van de Ven
- Re: No more kernel-source(code) ??? Neil Horman
- No more kernel-source(code) ??? (was: rawhide report: 20040623 changes) Leonard den Ottolander
- Re: No more kernel-source(code) ??? (was: rawhide report: 20040623 changes) Jack Neely
- Re: Smartcard base components Veiko Sinivee
- Re: No more kernel-source(code) ??? (was: rawhide report: 20040623 changes) Arjan van de Ven
- Re: Re: No more kernel-source(code) ??? (was: rawhide report: 20040623 changes) Jeff Spaleta
- Re: No more kernel-source(code) ??? (was: rawhide report: 20040623 changes) Jeremy Katz
- Re: No more kernel-source(code) ??? (was: rawhide report: 20040623 changes) Aaron Bennett
- GIF support Andres Petralli
- Re: More bad dependencies Mike Hearn
- Re: No more kernel-source(code) ??? (was: rawhide report: 20040623 changes) Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Unnanounced migration phase at its end, non-transparency, "open" community project ... (was: No more kernel-source(code) ???) Alexandre Oliva
- Re: No more kernel-source(code) ??? (was: rawhide report: 20040623 changes) Alexandre Oliva
- Re: No more kernel-source(code) ??? Brian Gerst
- Re: No more kernel-source(code) ??? (was: rawhide report: 20040623 changes) Thorsten Leemhuis
- Re: No more kernel-source(code) ??? (was: rawhide report: 20040623 changes) Daryll Strauss
- Re: No more kernel-source(code) ??? (was: rawhide report: 20040623 changes) Luciano Miguel Ferreira Rocha
- Re: No more kernel-source(code) ??? (was: rawhide report: 20040623 changes) Jason L Tibbitts III
- kernel-headers-<kversion>-<krelease>.<arch>.rpm (was: No more kernel-source(code) ???) Axel Thimm
- Re: Unnanounced migration phase at its end, non-transparency, "open" community project ... (was: No more kernel-source(code) ???) Axel Thimm
- kernel-sourcecode revived, thanks Arjan! (was: rawhide report: 20040625 changes) Axel Thimm
- Re: Unnanounced migration phase at its end, non-transparency, "open" community project ... (was: No more kernel-source(code) ???) Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Unnanounced migration phase at its end, non-transparency, "open" community project ... (was: No more kernel-source(code) ???) Axel Thimm
26 June 2004
27 June 2004
28 June 2004
29 June 2004
30 June 2004