[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Using a non-default file system in the "minimal installation"
- From: Noa Resare <noa resare com>
- To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Using a non-default file system in the "minimal installation"
- Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2004 21:23:48 +0200
tis 2004-06-01 klockan 20.58 skrev Martin Olsson:
> Hi,
>
> It would be nice if one could choose to use reiserfs (or any other file
> system) when doing a minimal installation WITHOUT having the disk3
> available. I mean, alot of users want to choose minimal install and then
> apt-get/yum home their packages later on, but the file system is
> something you really want from scratch so it should be possible (and
> practical) to use a non-default file system in the minimal install.
> Therefore I suggest that file systems util packages etc be moved from
> disk3 (and wherever they reside atm) to disk1.
Being able to install a minimal system with reiserfs support with only
the first cd is definitely on my wishlist also.
> Where can I find the list of packages that is included in the Fedora
> Core 2 minimal installation?
The 'core' and the 'base' group in
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/2/i386/os/Fedora/base/comps.xml
/noa
--
And the lions ate the christians and the christians burned the witches,
and even I am out of explanations -- Ola Salo
gpg fingerprint: F3C4 AC90 B885 FE15 344B 4D05 220B 7662 A190 6F09
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]