Re: Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora.

[Marius Andreiana <mandreiana rdslink ro>]

On Thu, 2004-06-03 at 18:53, Florian La Roche wrote:
> > If all our customers in RHEL space start saying "but why not use /srv" during
> > RHEL4 testing then maybe there is a case for change, otherwise its violating
> > the first principle of engineering "If it aint broke..."
yes!

> Right. I would hope that people who want to see the move happening to the /srv
> layout also take some minutes and lobby for doing these changes. Until now
> a see a huge majority who fears the change and does not believe in more
> longterm benefits from this?
yes. I don't see any benefits, only confusion:
- exactly what services go in /srv? everything which is in /var now?
- add another unclear partition (/srv) to decision making on
partitioning
- there are a lot of books/howtos which reference /var. Many people are
migrating to linux now. They read those, find it's different in reality,
confusing.

-- 
Marius Andreiana
Galuna - Solutii Linux in Romania
http://www.galuna.ro