[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel?-- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM)

From: Alan Cox <alan redhat com>
To: razvan vilt linux360 ro, Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
Cc:
Subject: Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel?-- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM)
Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2004 14:29:08 -0400

On Sun, Jun 06, 2004 at 08:14:53PM +0300, Razvan Corneliu C.R. d3vi1 VILT wrote:
> should not kill anything... Just move them in a separate repository,
> like.... say... Fedora Extras.

Anyone who wants to can. Packages are not in fedora extras because either
1. Patent issues
2. They are in core
3. Nobody has decided its worth doing..

References:
- Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM)
  - From: Bryan J. Smith
- Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM)
  - From: Alan Cox
- Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM)
  - From: William M. Quarles
- Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel? -- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM)
  - From: Alan Cox
- Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel?-- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM)
  - From: Chris Chabot
- Re: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc and kernel?-- not "lite" (386/486 @ 400MHz+, 256MB RAM)
  - From: Razvan Corneliu C.R. \"d3vi1\" VILT

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]