[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Shrinking/splitting up core Was: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc...
- From: Steven Pritchard <steve silug org>
- To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Shrinking/splitting up core Was: Why are there only i686 and i586 Version of glibc...
- Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 13:05:46 -0500
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 08:24:11AM -0600, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> I dont think Anaconda is meant to look at anything beyond the bare
> installation Cd's the rest should be done with first-boot. Maybe first
> boot should have a yum configuration section where you can enter the yum
> places you want to to point ot.
How's that going to work with kickstart-based installs/upgrades?
I'd really like to see a day where a person could fire up
kickstart-based upgrades on 200 cluster servers and have *everything*
upgraded when the systems reboot (assuming all of their local apps
were in an appropriate repository).
FWIW, I was doing stuff like this with engineering workstations
running HP-UX at a previous job 5 years ago using HP's Ignite-UX
tool... It still scares me a little that we don't have a tool even
that good yet.
That employer is using a *ton* of RHL now, and upgrades are nearly
unmanageable. Paying for RHEL would reduce the frequency of necessary
upgrades, and the money isn't necessarily a problem for them, but how
would they do all those upgrades? (In other words, I don't think this
is just a problem for Fedora Core/Extras/etc. users.)
Steve
--
Steven Pritchard - K&S Pritchard Enterprises, Inc.
Email: steve kspei com http://www.kspei.com/
Phone: (618)398-7360 Mobile: (618)567-7320
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]