On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 03:26:48AM +0000, W. Michael Petullo wrote: > Here is an easy one: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115478 > > The PAM RPM still requires glib 1 even though it looks like PAM is > built against glib 2. Ah, yes, another catch. Also, does anyone know why the openobex package requires glib? John Thacker