More bad dependencies

[Arjan van de Ven]

On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 06:26, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-06-21 at 18:12 -1000, Warren Togami wrote:
> > Realistically we will not be able to remove gtk+ from the default 
> > install anytime soon because too many proprietary applications will 
> > depend on it for many years to come.  However it is good to move 
> > applications to gtk2 whenever possible, because it makes i18n much less 
> > problematic.
> 
> Actually, there are a couple of things here:
> 1) The GNOME 1.x library stack.  I think we're close to being able to
> lose this and move it to a compat lib status, similar to compat-glibc,
> etc.  Mark it as deprecated and actually get rid of them within a
> release or two.  The amount of new software being released still using

we should indeed more agressively start marking such libs compat-*, even
if there's like one package in our distro still using it I guess.
What we can do in a somewhat later phase is prevent development against
these legacy libs somehow...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20040622/ddda3605/attachment.sig>