Preliminary OpenAFS 1.3.x RPM for Fedora Core 2

[Nicolas Mailhot]

Le mar, 22/06/2004 à 09:37 -0400, Matthew Miller a écrit :
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 08:47:53AM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > > Very good point. I'll add that. Is there a Proper way to specify multiple
> > > licenses in the license tag? "GPL and IPL", I guess? (As opposed to
> > > "GPL/IPL" -- that'd be for dual-licensed, right? So annoying that IBM didn't
> > > chose to just GPL this.)
> > usually I do something like "parts GPL parts IPL" or so
> 
> Hmmm; maybe even "IPL (OpenAFS) and GPL (kernel headers)" or "IPL; kernel
> build trees GPL".

Or even better two different packages with clearly defined licenses
(with the IPL part depending on the GPL one).

Licencing spaguetti is real hard for users/admins to handle. Please do
not mix multiple licenses in a single package - I hate to have to
untangle such a mess manually.

Dual licensing is different. One can just choose his preferred license
and forget about the other one.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20040622/4d37aa93/attachment.sig>