Re: Unnanounced migration phase at its end, non-transparency, "open" community project ... (was: No more kernel-source(code) ???)

[Aaron Bennett <aaron bennett olin edu>]

Arjan van de Ven wrote:

> > If you are going to change this procedure for Fedora Core to something 
> > like "install the src.rpm, edit a config file and rebuild it etc," it 
> > should not change mid-release!!!!!!!!!  
> >    
>
> Nobody, and I mean nobody, suggested doing this for FC2 so far.
>  

ok, my bad and sorry for the exclamation points.  I saw the change made 
to rawhide and thought that might be a proposal for FC2. 

> we already don't ship /usr/src/linux since about RHL7.1 days...
>  
no, but you ship /usr/src/linux-<version>; most people will find that.


> http://linux-ntfs.sourceforge.net/rpm/index.html is what I hope google will point at....
>
>
>  
me too.  That's one example.  What I'm saying is that, if the "standard" 
way of making a change to your kernel in Linux is to recompile from 
source in /usr/src/linux-$(uname -r), and on Fedora Core that is not the 
way to do it, it's got to be very well documented and public that the 
"new" way is to do <foo>.

Anyhow, thanks for reading.

- Aaron


--
Aaron Bennett
UNIX Administrator
Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering