Submission process (was: Re: Self-Introduction: Michael Tiemann)

[Michael Schwendt]

On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 23:18:40 +0200, Rudi Chiarito wrote:

[mach]

> > No. It's in fedora.us already in the "stable" repository (much to the
> > disliking of some people) and the fedora.us build system uses a modified
> 
> What are these people's objections? Instability? The use of apt-rpm?
> Security? Anything else?

Some issues collected here:  http://tinyurl.com/2hbgy
 
> My point is: get mach, rpmlint and equivalents into FC (not FE).

rpmlint is not bullet-proof and reports several false positives and misses
many packaging mistakes. If it isn't customized--as the fedora.us rpmlint
is a bit (or also take a look at http://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1788
)--it is less helpful.