Re: Future: fhs 2.3 compliance for fc3

[Jeremy Katz <katzj redhat com>]

On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 19:04, seth vidal wrote:
> I don't think talking about whether or not we like them is useful here.
> It is the fhs and fedora core should be compliant with it.

There are plenty of standards out there that are just silly, so
compliance for the sake of compliance is probably not the best
approach.  

Note: I'm not arguing one way or another on this one, just saying that
using the argument of "it's a standard" is somewhat weak.

Jeremy