[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: On disttags (was: Choosing rpm-release for fc1 and fdr add-on rpms)
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva redhat com>
- To: Axel Thimm <Axel Thimm ATrpms net>
- Cc: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: On disttags (was: Choosing rpm-release for fc1 and fdr add-on rpms)
- Date: 14 May 2004 01:51:56 -0300
On May 13, 2004, Axel Thimm <Axel Thimm ATrpms net> wrote:
> So will FC3 has disttags? :)
Frankly, I don't see the point of disttags for the core packages. The
only purpose of disttags IMHO is to differentiate builds of the very
same package for different OSs/releases. Fedora Core packages never
use this; if there's a rebuild for the next release of Fedora Core,
the build number is incremented. If there's an errata-like patch
build for an update for an earlier release, it can get a .1 suffix
to the released build number, for the first such build, and have this
suffix incremented for subsequent builds. So, when are they useful
for packages in the Core?
--
Alexandre Oliva http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva {redhat com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist oliva {lsd ic unicamp br, gnu.org}
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]