Re: Module symbol versions in installer kernel

[Alan Cox <alan redhat com>]

On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 10:19:52AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> I was wondering about this. Is it still the case that i586 performs _worse_
> on non-original-Pentium systems than i386? (Or is that wrong in the first
> place, or not relevant to kernels?)
> 
> Which brings up this question: are there any i586 systems out there with
> enough RAM to run anaconda anyway?

Yep. Anaconda will do a minimal install with selinux=0 in 64Mb. Also 586
as an architecture covers many later processors in socket 7 form, although
586 optimisation does not.