[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: On disttags (was: Choosing rpm-release for fc1 and fdr add-on rpms)
- From: Michael Schwendt <fedora wir-sind-cool org>
- To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: On disttags (was: Choosing rpm-release for fc1 and fdr add-on rpms)
- Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 23:58:26 +0200
On 18 May 2004 18:36:11 -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On May 18, 2004, Axel Thimm <Axel Thimm ATrpms xxx> wrote:
>
> > The bottom line is disttags bring a lot of benefits as can bee seen in
> > their implementation in the wild, have caused no harm, and come at
> > very little expense.
>
> I don't see benefits for the core proper, and I do see problems. So
> it's not as clear-cut as you say. The reality of add-on repositories
> is quite different because their goal is to use the same package on
> multiple OSs. Issuing updates doesn't work that way.
Disttags aren't as flexible as advertized, unless you create an ugly
hierarchy such as rh73 < rh80 < rhfc1 < rhfc2 and so on. And that doesn't
include Red Hat Enterprise Linux yet.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]