[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Making NPTL the default for FC3, vanilla i386 support
- From: Felipe Alfaro Solana <felipe_alfaro linuxmail org>
- To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub redhat com>, Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: Making NPTL the default for FC3, vanilla i386 support
- Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 16:00:05 +0200
On Wed, 2004-05-19 at 14:24, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> This means though that almost no FC3 programs can run
> on vanilla i386{SX,DX} CPUs. Is this a problem to anyone?
Red Hat 9 was almost impossible to run decently on an i386-class machine
due to lack of resources (mainly, the CPU). I sill have a 386DX/20 lying
around, but it's simply unable to run anything newer than a 2.0, or
2.2-kernel based distribution.
> Fedora Core installer will certainly not install on i486
> either, but if rpms from FC3 are used by RULE project...
> There have been some i486+ only instructions accidentally
> used in the past in many C++ programs (from libstdc++-v3
> headers) and apparently nobody noticed this in RHL or
> Fedora, so I assume not really many people are attempting
> to revive their i386 boxes.
As I said before, EnGarde Secure Linux 1.0, which is 2.2-kernel-based,
is what that machine can run at most.
> Another alternative is to change all rpms in FC3 which are .i386.rpm
> in FC2 to .i486.rpm, with rpmrc:
> optflags: i386 -O2 -g -march=i386 -m32
> optflags: i486 -O2 -g -march=i486 -mtune=pentium4 -m32
> optflags: i586 -O2 -g -march=i586 -m32
> optflags: i686 -O2 -g -march=i686 -mtune=pentium4 -m32
> optflags: athlon -O2 -g -march=athlon -m32
I like this one. Go for it!
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]