[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: VPN solution(s) for Fedora Core
- From: Jesse Keating <jkeating j2solutions net>
- To: fedora-devel-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: VPN solution(s) for Fedora Core
- Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 21:10:10 -0700
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 22 May 2004 19:06, Nathan Robertson wrote:
> I know this will leave a bad taste in peoples mouths, but from a
> practicality point of view the Microsoft VPN (MPPE and friends, iirc)
> is implemented by a kernel patch in ppp CVS (providing the ppp_mppe
> module). I've got that patch in my kernel at the moment and it works
> well. The great thing is that it works with everything - Linux, Mac
> OS X and Windows, and works over a masquerade for the client. I think
> these two points are important (particularly useful for RHEL
> customers, I would have thought) - range of client compatibility, and
> the client working over a masquerade.
>
> The patch has been around for a fair while (I've had it patched in
> for about 6 months now, god knows how long it's been around before
> that). I haven't bothered looking into why Linus hasn't merged it,
> since crypto is now in the kernel. Maybe patent issues in the US?
I do believe the biggest thing is that the module taints your kernel.
Non GPL compliant I do believe.
- --
Jesse Keating RHCE (http://geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team (http://www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key
(http://geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
Was I helpful? Let others know:
http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAsCQi4v2HLvE71NURAvt5AKCV95mNps8qJbMdiF3jWilv//81uACgoQag
uDKtgNWas3kAW4a5N7VkbbE=
=kXZF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]