[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: The return of the acute-cedilla BUG FROM HELL
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva redhat com>
- To: Z <zleite mminternet com>
- Cc: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: The return of the acute-cedilla BUG FROM HELL
- Date: 25 May 2004 12:17:17 -0300
On May 24, 2004, Z <zleite mminternet com> wrote:
> FC2 has again the bug on the us-acentos keymap. Pressing "'" + c gives
> an non-existing symbol (at least non-existing in the languages I know)
> instad of the cedilla.
Well, Ä surely exists in some languages, and you have to agree that it
would be damn surprising if Ä were to prefer Ä over Ã. Why the heck
is the acute accent *under* the letter, one would think...
If your locale is pt (or pt_BR?), gtk apps will map 'c to Ã, but X
will still compose 'c into Ä. That's bad, and inconsistent. The
solution (untested) is to create a file in
/usr/lib/X11/locale/pt_BR.UTF-8/Compose, adapted from
/usr/lib/X11/locale/en_US.UTF-8/Compose, in which the combinations of
<dead_acute> and <c> or <C> are mapped to the à and à characters,
instead of Ä and Ä as they are. Then adjust compose.dir in the parent
directory such that pt_BR.UTF-8 is mapped to this new Compose rules.
Maybe there's a way to create a specialization of the Compose rules; I
don't know.
Then, work to get this change into upstream Xorg, and it will be fixed
in whatever Fedora Core release happens to integrate the Xorg release
that has your change.
Personally, I just got used to entering <Multi_key> <,> <c> to
generate Ã. Being a native pt_BR speaker, and writing a
non-negligible amount of e-mail in Portuguese, I don't find it to be
too much of a pain, as long as you know about it, and use a reasonable
key for <Multi_key> (AKA Compose). I use the AltGR key for this
purpose; others choose the Win-key, or the Menu key. You can easily
select one of them in the Layout Options in Keyboard Preferences.
> I saw some bugs related to this in bugzilla. Shoud I file it anyway?
You're probably better off filing an enhancement request with upstream
Xorg. We don't have a bug here, just an inconvenience that takes some
getting-used-to.
> It seems to be a reversion from the xorg migration.
As far as I can tell you're mistaken. From personal experience, FC1
(and probably RHL9) worked just the same in this regard, at least as
far as X11 is concerned. I haven't checked for changes in gtk within
pt_BR locales, though; this might have changed. Maybe you had
different i18n settings. For example, switching from ISO-8859-1 to
UTF-8, or from pt_BR to en_US would have changed the 'c compose rules
on at least some applications.
--
Alexandre Oliva http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva {redhat com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist oliva {lsd ic unicamp br, gnu.org}
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]