[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Boot poster challenge
- From: Enrico Scholz <enrico scholz informatik tu-chemnitz de>
- To: fedora-devel-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: Boot poster challenge
- Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 13:17:24 +0100
alan redhat com (Alan Cox) writes:
>> > You can also look at the work that gentoo has done in this area
>> > Unfortunately their runlevels do not conform to either LSB
>>
>> Current RH/FC initscripts do not do this either...
>
> They should do. Detail the error please
* http://refspecs.freestandards.org/LSB_2.0.1/LSB-Core/LSB-Core/iniscrptact.html
RH/FC initscripts do not have:
* try-restart, force-reload actions
* do not return the LSB error-codes
* http://refspecs.freestandards.org/LSB_2.0.1/LSB-Core/LSB-Core/initscrcomconv.html
These comments are neither in RH/FC initscripts, nor supported by the
initsystem.
* http://refspecs.freestandards.org/LSB_2.0.1/LSB-Core/LSB-Core/iniscrptfunc.html
These functions are not used by the RH/FC initscript; instead of
'daemon' or 'killproc' are there.
I do not say that these are errors; just that the RH/FC initscripts are
not LSB compliant.
Enrico
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]