[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: ip_conntrack and IPv6
- From: "Trever L. Adams" <tadams-lists myrealbox com>
- To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: ip_conntrack and IPv6
- Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 13:49:33 -0700
Well, that is a crying shame. Out of curiosity does RedHat seem much
demand for squid use in business, and if so, are they helping with
development?
Just a question. I understand they have to be quite judicious about
where and how they spend the development resources (including money)
that they have.
Trever
On Wed, 2004-11-17 at 14:27 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 22:39 -0700, Trever L. Adams wrote:
> > Arg, yes bad form replying to myself. Please, forgive me for all of my
> > stupidity today. Add ipv6 enabled squid to that as well (it is not to
> > hide ip addresses, but because of the caching feature as well as the
> > fact I have filters I can plug into it).
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=131558
>
> --
> dwmw2
>
--
If it's there and you can see it, it's REAL If it's there and you can't
see it, it's TRANSPARENT If it's not there and you can see it, it's
VIRTUAL If it's not there and you can't see it, it's GONE! -- Unknown
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]