[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: RFR: more FC4 Requests



On Sat, 2004-11-20 at 08:49 -0500, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> Are there any other known deficient implementations that might 
> meaningfully be
> removed in FC4?

we should consider replacing/rewriting up2date realistically...

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]