[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Please review this list of potentially missing .so symlinks.



On Sat, Nov 27, 2004 at 06:52:56PM -0500, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> liblber-2.2.so
> libldap-2.2.so
> libldap_r-2.2.so

These don't need to be there.  The shared library versioning is meant to
have no effect on how you need to compile applications.

> liblber.so
> libldap_r.so

These should be in openldap-devel, along with libldap.so.

> libnss_db.so

I'd think that's of dubious value, but glibc provides similar links for
the NSS modules it includes, so not having them in nss_db is a bug.

> libpthread.so

This is in /usr/%{_lib}, even if the library lives under /%{_lib}.  It
can't be in /%{_lib} because the linker doesn't search that directory
for libraries when you link applications (per "gcc -print-search-dirs").

> libpwdb.so

The shared library to which this link would point is a compat package.

Cheers,

Nalin


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]